New Communist China News Aggregator

Who would have thought that ueber-neocons Chucky Johnson and the man in the funny hat Roger Simon would bring us such a precious gift? From the site of Open Pajamas Media (aka Open Sores Media, aka Open Sewers Media, and sorry, I forget the URL):

Read the whole story over at Chucky’s favorite site.

Chairman Simon, OSM’s Great Helmsman

Update: I see Michael Turton beat me to this one.

The Discussion: 12 Comments

If you look at google news (, half of the aggregated news there are also from Xinhua. Google news is without human editors, just computers collecting news based on algorithms of which piece and source are reputable and important. So, do you think you are better than Google?

Also, what is wrong with Xinhua? It is a internationally famous and responsible news agency. Please don’t attack things wildly!

Also, what’s wrong with those news pieces from Xinhua on OSM? Those news look very normal to me, and they are very important too.

I support Xinhua news! Absolutely support it!

November 20, 2005 @ 9:58 pm | Comment

It’s simply the irony of these guys on a perpetual anti-communism rant. I love Xinhua too. Wouldn’t start my day without it.

November 20, 2005 @ 11:00 pm | Comment

OSM has been like that from day one. I already complained to those 2 guys.

Richard can’t start a perfect day without Xinhua Reading, CCP-hired rats, such as HongXing ๐Ÿ™‚

November 20, 2005 @ 11:20 pm | Comment

Who is this HongXing and where did he/she/it suddenly materialise from?

November 21, 2005 @ 12:41 am | Comment

According to Ivan, this HongXing actually shares most of his/her/its DNA profile from a common rat! Why so deferential to he/she/it then?

November 21, 2005 @ 12:43 am | Comment


I didn’t say it was a “common” rat.
The DNA sample was more like Mickey Mouse after years of Communist brainwashing.

November 21, 2005 @ 1:10 am | Comment

My favourite headline from that selection is:

XIN: URGENT: Opposing “Taiwan Independence” in interest of China, US: Hu

I just love the combination of old-school Chinese propaganda and American newspaper headline conventions.

November 21, 2005 @ 4:14 am | Comment

AP style book with communist by-line. You got it.

November 21, 2005 @ 5:35 am | Comment

“Also, what is wrong with Xinhua? It is a internationally famous and responsible news agency.”

Am I supposed to assume this was said sarcastically or what?

November 21, 2005 @ 1:25 pm | Comment


XINHUA says it’s an internationally famous and responsible new agenecy. Isn’t that good enough for you?

Do you have a problem with self-authenticating authority?

“As we all know……..” (Communist epistemology)

November 21, 2005 @ 3:31 pm | Comment


Ah, no – how can I dare challenge glorious Xinhua’s greatness ๐Ÿ˜€

I mean, we all know how many international press awards it has won ๐Ÿ˜‰

November 22, 2005 @ 10:47 am | Comment

Xinhua is about as responsible as the New York Times (interpret this as you will ๐Ÿ˜‰ )

November 23, 2005 @ 1:30 pm | Comment

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.