Former Tiananmen protestor condemns France’s coddling of China, rebuke of Taiwan

Wuer Kaixi , a Tiananmen protestor who fled China for Taiwan in 1989, has some powerful things to say about Chirac’s cozying up to the Chinese last week, and especially his reprimand of Taiwan. It may be one of the most eloquent appeals I’ve ever read.

I and others who managed to escape [the Tiananmen Square crackdown] were given refuge, and for a brief period the international community paused and reappraised its relationship with a regime that was prepared to put down a peaceful people’s movement with troops and tanks.

Where has that reappraisal brought us? Sadly, it seems nowhere. Since the Tiananmen bloodshed, we have seen a parade of foreign leaders and multinational corporations feting China’s leaders, as if somehow things have changed for the better. Nothing has changed. If anything, China’s leaders have learned their lesson, and have a tighter grip on power today than they did then. And doubters need only look to Taiwan, and recently also to Hong Kong – where on Jan. 1, 500,000 people took to the streets for greater democratic freedoms.

Realpolitik demands that we be practical on the Taiwan issue; but it should also demand that we not delude ourselves about China. In 1989, Beijing chose military action over open dialogue with a peaceful people’s movement; today it tells us that a popular vote in Taiwan risks invasion. I fear now, when I see the leaders of the United States and France reprimanding Taiwan, that the ideals that those countries were founded on, that my countrymen shed blood for in Tiananmen, and that Taiwan now challenges with a popular vote, have become disposable.

Na├»vely, I had hoped for better of France, which has become the latest in a roll call of democracies – the United States included – that appear ready to abandon Taiwan’s right to democratic freedoms if that is how Beijing says it must be.

Yes, very naive, unfortunately. The West just has too much riding on China to risk insulting its leaders. I’m no great supporter of Chen and his antics. But I do think it’s fair to say Taiwan has been doublecrossed. I can understand the acute disappointment, especially from one who fled China in 1989 and knows only too well what it’s capable of.

The Discussion: 4 Comments

I can easily imagine a scenario in which China attempts economic blackmail against the U.S. — for example, by threatening to stop underwriting the U.S. current-account deficit, or by offering to remove the yuan-dollar peg — in exchange for tacit U.S. approval of an invasion of Taiwan.

Of course China needs the rest of the world just as much as the world needs China, but I’m sure there are elements in the Chinese leadership who would view a return to Maoist self-sufficiency as a small price to pay for the glory of “reuniting” China.

January 31, 2004 @ 6:57 pm | Comment

cool. my site has a letter he wrote to the Far Eastern Economic review.

January 31, 2004 @ 8:30 pm | Comment

Vaara, I want to think most of those Maoists are in their graves. But then, when issues like Taiwan arise and the leaders get all prickly and jingoistic and war-mongering, I have to wonder….

February 1, 2004 @ 11:28 am | Comment

Don’t you just love the way Chirac was trying to get the EU embargo on selling weapons to China removed at the same time as he was denouncing the Taiwan referendum? Of course he wouldn’t want Taiwan to do anything that might incite China to attack *before* he’s had a chance to sell a few missiles to them!

Incidentally, if you’re interested in an article defending Chen Shui-Bian’s referendum plans, have a look at

February 2, 2004 @ 11:47 pm | Comment

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.