Frank Rich: Whatever Happened to the America of 9/12


Whatever Happened to the America of 9/12?

Published: September 10, 2006

‘THE most famous picture nobody’s ever seen’ is how the Associated Press photographer Richard Drew has referred to his photo of an unidentified World Trade Center victim hurtling to his death on 9/11. It appeared in some newspapers, including this one, on 9/12 but was soon shelved. ‘In the most photographed and videotaped day in the history of the world,’ Tom Junod later wrote in Esquire, ‘the images of people jumping were the only images that became, by consensus, taboo.’


Five years later, Mr. Drew’s ‘falling man’ remains a horrific artifact of the day that was supposed to change everything and did not. But there’s another taboo 9/11 photo, about life rather than death, that is equally shocking in its way, so much so that Thomas Hoepker of Magnum Photos kept it under wraps for four years. Mr. Hoepker’s picture can now be found in David Friends compelling new 9/11 book, Watching the World Change, or on the books Web site, It shows five young friends on the waterfront in Brooklyn, taking what seems to be a lunch or bike-riding break, enjoying the radiant late-summer sun and chatting away as cascades of smoke engulf Lower Manhattan in the background.

Mr. Hoepker found his subjects troubling. ‘They were totally relaxed like any normal afternoon,’he told Mr. Friend. ‘It’s possible they lost people and cared, but they were not stirred by it.’The photographer withheld the picture from publication because ‘we didn’t need to see that, then.’ He feared ‘it would stir the wrong emotions.’ But ‘over time, with perspective,’ he discovered, ‘it grew in importance.’

Seen from the perspective of 9/11’s fifth anniversary, Mr. Hoepker’s photo is prescient as well as important – a snapshot of history soon to come. What he caught was this: Traumatic as the attack on America was, 9/11 would recede quickly for many. This is a country that likes to move on, and fast. The young people in Mr. Hoepker’s photo aren’t necessarily callous. They’re just American. In the five years since the attacks, the ability of Americans to dust themselves off and keep going explains both what’s gone right and what’s gone wrong on our path to the divided and dispirited state the nation finds itself in today.

What’s gone right: the terrorists failed to break America’s back. The ‘new’ normal lasted about 10 minutes, except at airport check-ins. The economy, for all its dips and inequities and runaway debt, was not destroyed. The culture, for better and worse, survived intact. It took only four days for television networks to restore commercials to grim news programming. Some two weeks after that Rudy Giuliani ritualistically welcomed laughter back to American living rooms by giving his on-camera imprimatur to ‘Saturday Night Live.’ Before 9/11, Americans feasted on reality programs, nonstop coverage of child abductions and sex scandals. Five years later, they still do. The day that changed everything didn’t make Americans change the channel, unless it was from “ear Factor to American Idol or from Pamela Anderson to Paris Hilton.

For those directly affected by the terrorists’ attacks, this resilience can be hard to accept. In New York, far more than elsewhere, a political correctness about 9/11 is still strictly enforced. We bridle when the mayor of New Orleans calls ground zero ‘a hole in the ground’ (even though, sadly, he spoke the truth). We complain that Hollywood movies about 9/11 are ‘too soon,’ even as United 93 and World Trade Center came and went with no controversy at multiplexes in middle America. The Freedom Tower and (now kaput) International Freedom Center generated so much political rancor that in New York freedom has become just another word for a lofty architectural project soon to be scrapped.

The price of all New York’s 9/11 P.C. is obvious: the 16 acres of ground zero are about the only ones that have missed out on the city’s roaring post-attack comeback. But the rest of the country is less invested. For tourists – and maybe for natives, too – the hole in the ground is a more pungent memorial than any grandiose official edifice. You can still see the naked wound where it has not healed and remember (sort of) what the savage attack was about.

But even as we celebrate this resilience, it too comes at a price. The companion American trait to resilience is forgetfulness. What we’ve forgotten too quickly is the outpouring of affection and unity that swelled against all odds in the wake of Al Qaeda’s act of mass murder. If you were in New York then, you saw it in the streets, and not just at ground zero, where countless thousands of good Samaritans joined the official responders and caregivers to help, at the cost of their own health. You saw it as New Yorkers of every kind gathered around the spontaneous shrines to the fallen and the missing at police and fire stations, at churches and in parks, to lend solace or a hand. This good feeling quickly spread to Capitol Hill, to red states where New York had once been Sodom incarnate and to the world, the third world included, where America was a nearly uniform object of sympathy and grief.

At the National Cathedral prayer service on Sept. 14, 2001, President Bush found just the apt phrase to describe this phenomenon: “Today we feel what Franklin Roosevelt called ‘the warm courage of national unity.’ This is the unity of every faith and every background. It has joined together political parties in both houses of Congress.” What’s more, he added, ‘this unity against terror is now extending across the world.’

The destruction of that unity, both in this nation and in the world, is as much a cause for mourning on the fifth anniversary as the attack itself. As we can’t forget the dead of 9/11, we can’t forget how the only good thing that came out of that horror, that unity, was smothered in its cradle.

When F.D.R. used the phrase ‘the warm courage of national unity,’ it was at his first inaugural, in 1933, as the country reeled from the Great Depression. It is deeply moving to read that speech today. In its most famous line, Roosevelt asserted his ‘firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself – nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance.’ Another passage is worth recalling, too: ‘We now realize as we have never realized before our interdependence on each other; that we cannot merely take but we must give as well; that if we are to go forward, we must move as a trained and loyal army willing to sacrifice for the good of a common discipline, because without such discipline no progress is made, no leadership becomes effective.’

What followed under Roosevelt’s leadership is one of history’s most salutary stories. Americans responded to his twin entreaties – to renounce fear and to sacrifice for the common good – with a force that turned back economic calamity and ultimately an axis of brutal enemies abroad. What followed Mr. Bush’s speech at the National Cathedral, we know all too well, is another story.

On the very next day after that convocation, Mr. Bush was asked at a press conference ‘how much of a sacrifice’ ordinary Americans would ‘be expected to make in their daily lives, in their daily routines.’ His answer: ‘Our hope, of course, is that they make no sacrifice whatsoever.’ He, too, wanted to move on – to ‘see life return to normal in America,â€? as he put it – but toward partisan goals stealthily tailored to his political allies rather than the nearly 90 percent of the country that, according to polls, was rallying around him.

This selfish agenda was there from the very start. As we now know from many firsthand accounts, a cadre from Mr. Bush’s war cabinet was already busily hyping nonexistent links between Iraq and the Qaeda attacks. The presidential press secretary, Ari Fleischer, condemned Bill Maher’s irreverent comic response to 9/11 by reminding ‘all Americans that they need to watch what they say, watch what they do.’ Fear itself – the fear that ‘paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance,’ as F.D.R. had it – was already being wielded as a weapon against Americans by their own government.

Less than a month after 9/11, the president was making good on his promise of ‘no sacrifice whatsoever.’ Speaking in Washington about how it was ‘the time to be wise’ and ‘the time to act,’ he declared, ‘We need for there to be more tax cuts.’ Before long the G.O.P. would be selling 9/11 photos of the president on Air Force One to campaign donors and the White House would be featuring flag-draped remains of the 9/11 dead in political ads.

And so here we are five years later. Fearmongering remains unceasing. So do tax cuts. So does the war against a country that did not attack us on 9/11. We have moved on, but no one can argue that we have moved ahead.

The Discussion: 17 Comments

The Falling Man is always the image that haunts me to this day. I can’t get that picture out of my head, as I only saw it once up to this day, but I’ll always associate the horrors of 9-11 with that image.

September 10, 2006 @ 7:05 am | Comment

He had faith in God. He was raised that way. I hope he realized the false nature of his religion, at least before his skull cracked in dirt exploding white brains all over.

September 10, 2006 @ 12:49 pm | Comment

Jessica…you were being so good…don’t start with comments like that again if you want to stay here…

No one knows who this man was. No one knows his nationality, let alone his religious beliefs. People from all over the world died at the WTC, and though I know it’s hard for you to accept, not all Americans are Christians, and many of us are not religious at all.

When you say stuff like what you just said, it sounds absolutely crazy.

September 10, 2006 @ 1:34 pm | Comment

Richard, I’m feeling the urge for some internet mob retaliation, I see no reason why contact information for this scum should not be posted.

Go to hell, Jessica. I await the day when you die and realize there IS a hell.

September 10, 2006 @ 1:36 pm | Comment

Oh, and in addition to my first comment above (made in light of a certain history with “Jessica”), I should add that if you can’t spare a moment’s compassion for a person falling to his death under such horrible circumstances, regardless of his religious beliefs, then I feel very sorry for you.

September 10, 2006 @ 3:12 pm | Comment

Okay, your statement “I die and realize there IS a hell” is an irrational and illogical statement.

Without logic and rationality, the foundation for any discussion does not exist.

As a side note, do you think about why you demonstrate such firmly belief in hell?

September 10, 2006 @ 3:56 pm | Comment

For all Jessica knows, it may have been one of his countrymen falling to his death. Yes, there were Chinese people killed on 9/11. I remember shortly afterwards, the Chinese government put out a press release (in Chinese) expressing sorrow “for all Chinese killed in the terrorist attacks.”

September 10, 2006 @ 8:23 pm | Comment

So much for my being a nice guy. “Jessica” is banned again.

September 10, 2006 @ 8:25 pm | Comment

Jst thinking what made that man jump from WTC frighten me. That is fear and horror far beyond anyone’s imagination. He had no way to escape the flame and to get out the building. He did not want his face burnt to unrecognizable; he did not want his body crushed to mash by falling floors. He jumped becasue he wanted a dignifed death. I believe this man must have great strength and courage, or he cannt make that jump.

September 10, 2006 @ 9:56 pm | Comment

Yes, Jessica, I am a religious person, atleast I try to be. But there is one thing about religion that people like you can never understand: faith. The very nature of religion that makes it seemingly contrary to logic, science, or commons sense is the very thing that draws people to its churches, synagogues, temples, and mosques: a belief in something you can’t proove. Even athiests can understand and appreciate the faith of people with belief, because they have faith in mankind, faith in science, and faith in themselves. People have faith, whether it is religious or secular in nature. You, on the other hand, not only misunderstand faith, but you despise and hate people with it. You are disgusting.

Whether or not there is a hell in the world beyond doesn’t matter. If there is, you’ll burn in it and regret denying it. If there isn’t, you’ll still die, but die without friends. How pathetic.

September 10, 2006 @ 11:56 pm | Comment

Chip, I would recommend you not feed the trolls. Yes, Jesica is going to hell, for her Hao Wu comments alone some months ago. He (and it is a he) is scum, and brings whole new dimensions to the concept of what a piece of shit really is.

September 11, 2006 @ 12:32 am | Comment

I don’t believe in hell in the religious sense, but my guess is “Jessica” is already in hell, the very special kind that tormented people create for themselves here on earth.

September 11, 2006 @ 12:54 am | Comment

On a documentary broadcast on French television last week, they showed quite a bit of footage of those jumping to their deaths. One interviewee in the documentary said, “I saw a suit fly by my window and I wondered why would someone throw a suit out a window. Then I saw another one.”

I think one reason we find these images, and, for that matter, the 911 tapes of people screaming for their lives (some of which were also heard during the documentary), so disturbing is simply that it forces us to be witnesses to the deaths.

We know that several thousand people died. But statistics do not convey, as do images and sound, the true horror of those who lost their lives that day.

Whether or not footage or tapes of somebody’s last moments, especially moments of panic and anguish, should be broadcast at all is open to debate. What are people’s thoughts on the issue? Does it add to our understanding of the event or are we giving in to darker impulses?

September 11, 2006 @ 2:16 am | Comment

I have no problem with people of faith.

However I do have big problem with people who push restlessly their faith onto others.

Science with faith is pseudo-science. Although creationism is science for you, it is a joke anywhere else in the world.

On a side note, if you feel 9/11 horrible, I suggest you to think about all the people in Iraq, Lebanon, and Afghanistan under the persistent death, horror and chaos brought on by America.

September 11, 2006 @ 8:21 am | Comment

Jessica, I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but this site (and mine for that matter) is filled with posts about the tragedy in Afghanistan and Iraq brought on by the Bush Administration. I find that I grieve for 9/11 not just because of the deaths in NY and DC and Kentucky, but because of the horrible consequences it has had for the rest of the world. Truly it is a tragedy of staggering magnitude, and the shame of Iraq will stain our nation for a very long time.

Oh, and I don’t believe in creationism either. Really, you COULD have a dialog here if you would stop insisting that everybody thinks the same way and shares the same religious beliefs. WE DON’T! In fact, I very much resent the intrusion of others’ personal religious beliefs into what I feel are secular issues and none of their damn business.

September 11, 2006 @ 10:35 am | Comment

Otherlisa, I actually agree with your last post.

September 11, 2006 @ 10:40 am | Comment


Also, not every single religious person believes in cut-and-dry creationism either. I for one believe in evolution. Stop painting everybody with your big paintbrushes and assumptions, it just makes an ass out of you and me (mostly just you). Go die.

September 11, 2006 @ 8:03 pm | Comment

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.