Frank Rich: Bush Returns to the Crime Scene (Katrina)

Required reading.

Return to the Scene of the Crime
Published: August 27, 2006

PRESIDENT BUSH travels to the Gulf Coast this week, ostensibly to mark the first anniversary of Hurricane Katrina. Everyone knows his real mission: to try to make us forget the first anniversary of the downfall of his presidency. As they used to say in the French Quarter, bonne chance! The ineptitude bared by the storm – no planning for a widely predicted catastrophe, no attempt to secure a city besieged by looting, no strategy for anything except spin – is indelible. New Orleans was Iraq redux with an all-American cast. The discrepancy between Mr. Bush’s ‘heckuva job’ shtick and the reality on the ground induced a Cronkite-in-Vietnam epiphany for news anchors. At long last they and the country demanded answers to the questions about the administration’s competence that had been soft-pedaled two years earlier when the war first went south.

What’s’amazing on Katrina’s first anniversary is how little Mr. Bush seems aware of this change in the political weather. He’s still in a bubble. At last week’s White House press conference, he sounded as petulant as Tom Cruise on the ‘Today’ show when Matt Lauer challenged him about his boorish criticism of Brooke Shields. Asked what Iraq had to do with the attack on the World Trade Center, Mr. Bush testily responded, ‘Nothing,’ adding that ‘nobody has ever suggested in this administration that Saddam Hussein ordered the attacks.’ Like the emasculated movie star, the president is still so infatuated with his own myth that he believes the public will buy such nonsense.

As the rest of the world knows, the White House connived 24/7 to pound in the suggestion that Saddam ordered the attacks on 9/11. ‘The Bush administration had repeatedly tied the Iraq war to Sept. 11,’ Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton write in ‘Without Precedent,’ their new account of their stewardship of the 9/11 commission. The nonexistent Qaeda-Saddam tie-in was as much a selling point for the war as the nonexistent W.M.D. The salesmanship was so merciless that half the country was brainwashed into believing that the 9/11 hijackers had been Iraqis.

To achieve this feat, Dick Cheney spent two years publicly hyping a ‘pretty well confirmed’ (translation: unconfirmed) pre-9/11 meeting in Prague between Mohamed Atta and a Saddam intelligence officer, continuing to do so long after this specious theory had been discredited. Mr. Bush’s strategy was to histrionically stir 9/11 and Iraq into the same sentence whenever possible, before the invasion and after. Typical was his May 1, 2003, oration declaring the end of ‘major combat operations.’ After noting that ‘the battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on September 11th, 2001,’ he added: ‘With those attacks, the terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States. And war is what they got.’ To paraphrase the former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke, this was tantamount to saying that the Japanese attacked us on Dec. 7, 1941, and war with Mexico is what they got.

Were it not so tragic, Mr. Bush’s claim that he had never suggested a connection between the 9/11 attacks and Iraq would be as ludicrous as Bill Clinton’s doomed effort to draw a distinction between sex and oral sex. The tragedy is that the country ever believed Mr. Bush, particularly those Americans who were moved to enlist because of 9/11 and instead ended up fighting a war that the president now concedes had ‘nothing’ to do with the 9/11 attacks.

A representative and poignant example, brought to light by The Los Angeles Times, is Patrick R. McCaffrey, a Silicon Valley auto-body-shop manager with two children who joined the California National Guard one month after 9/11. He was eager to do his bit for homeland security by helping protect the Shasta Dam or Golden Gate Bridge. Instead he was sent to Iraq, where he was killed in 2004. In a replay of the Pentagon subterfuge surrounding the friendly-fire death of Pat Tillman, another post-9/11 enlistee betrayed by his country, Mr. McCaffrey’s death was at first officially attributed to an ambush by insurgents. Only after two years of investigation did the Army finally concede that his killers were actually the Iraqi security forces he was helping to train.

‘He said we had no business in Iraq and should not be there,’ his mother, Nadia McCaffrey, told the paper. Last week’s belated presidential admission that Iraq had nothing to do with the attacks on America that inspired Patrick McCaffrey’s service was implicitly an admission that he and many like him died in Iraq for nothing as well.

Mr. Bush’s press-conference disavowalof his habitual efforts to connect 9/11 to Saddam will be rolled back by the White House soon enough. When the fifth anniversary of 9/11 arrives in two weeks, you can bet that the president will once again invoke the Qaeda attacks to justify the Iraq war, especially now that we are adding troops (through the involuntary call-up of reservists) rather than subtracting any. The new propaganda strategy will be right out of Lewis Carroll: If we leave the country that had nothing to do with 9/11, then 9/11 will happen again.

But before we get to that White House P.R. offensive, there is next week’s Katrina show. It has its work cut out for it. A year after the storm, the reconstruction of New Orleans echoes our reconstruction of Baghdad. A ‘truth squad’ of House Democrats has cataloged the ‘waste, fraud, abuse or mismanagement’ in $8.75 billion worth of contracts, most of which were awarded noncompetitively. Only 60 percent of the city has electricity. Half of the hospitals and three-quarters of the child-care centers remain closed. Violent crime is on the rise. Less than half of the population has returned.

How do you pretty up this picture? As an opening act, Mr. Bush met on Wednesday with Rockey Vaccarella, a Katrina survivor who with much publicity drove a ‘replica’ of a FEMA trailer from New Orleans to Washington to seek an audience with the president. No Cindy Sheehan bum’s rush for him. Mr. Bush granted his wish and paraded him before the press. That was enough to distract the visitor from his professed message to dramatize the unfinished job on the Gulf. Instead Mr. Vaccarella effusively thanked the president for ‘the millions of FEMA trailers’ complete with air-conditioning and TV. ‘You know, I wish you had another four years, man,’ he said. ‘If we had this president for another four years, I think we’d be great.’

The CNN White House correspondent, Ed Henry, loved it. ‘Hollywood couldn’t have scripted this any better, a gritty guy named Rockey slugging it out, trying to realize his dream and getting that dream realized against all odds,’ he said. He didn’t ask how this particular Rockey, a fast-food manager who lost everything a year ago, financed this mission or so effortlessly pulled it off. It was up to bloggers and Democrats to report shortly thereafter that Mr. Vaccarella had run as a Republican candidate for the St. Bernard Parish commission in 1999. It was up to Iris Hageney of Gretna, La., to complain on the Times-Picayune Web site that the episode was ‘a huge embarrassment’ that would encourage Americans to ‘forget the numerous people who still don’t have trailers or at least one with electricity or water.’

That is certainly the White House game plan as it looks toward the president’s two-day return to the scene of the crime. Just as it brought huge generators to floodlight Mr. Bush’s prime-time recovery speech in Jackson Square a year ago – and then yanked the plug as soon as he was done – so it will stop at little to bathe this anniversary in the rosiest possible glow.

Douglas Brinkley, the Tulane University historian who wrote the best-selling account of Katrina, ‘The Great Deluge,’ is worried that even now the White House is escaping questioning about what it is up to (and not) in the Gulf. ‘I don’t think anybody’s getting the Bush strategy,’ he said when we talked last week. ‘The crucial point is that the inaction is deliberate – the inaction is the action.’ As he sees it, the administration, tacitly abetted by New Orleans’s opportunistic mayor, Ray Nagin, is encouraging selective inertia, whether in the rebuilding of the levees (‘Only Band-Aids have been put on them’), the rebuilding of the Lower Ninth Ward or the restoration of the wetlands. The destination: a smaller city, with a large portion of its former black population permanently dispersed. ‘Out of the Katrina debacle, Bush is making political gains,’ Mr. Brinkley says incredulously. ‘The last blue state in the Old South is turning into a red state.’

Perhaps. But with no plan for salvaging either of the catastrophes on his watch, this president can no sooner recover his credibility by putting on an elaborate show of sermonizing and spin this week than Mr. Cruise could levitate his image by jumping up and down on Oprah’s couch. While the White Housess latest screenplay may have been conceived as ‘Mission Accomplished II,’ what we’re likely to see play out in New Orleans won’t even be a patch on ‘Mission: Impossible III.’

The Discussion: One Comment

Mr. Rich,

You state “At long last they and the country demanded answers to the questions about the administration’s competence that had been soft-pedaled two years earlier when the war first went south.” “They” being the media.

I wish you were right, but alas…

This administration is not incompetent. Brownie did, in fact, do “a heck of a job.” But, since their usual scapegoats, OBL and the military arm of Al Qaeda, were nowhere near NO, they failed to rally Americans against the real criminals of NO – the arab terrorists.

They have successfully accomplished virtually every goal that can be determined that they had. Whenever you fall back on the accusation that this administration is incompetent, every red in the country is smiling, because they know their goals are being advanced. Bush and Coulture sound credible.

The public not only buys the nonsense, they are paying an extraordinarily high price. NO is turning red, the NO blues can be heard in Houston where the dilution will not change the hue (nor cry).

Also, once again you obfuscate and distract from the truth by using a two year marker for when the war went south. The war went south the day the Commander in Chief decided to attack a country that was independent and not a threat – I think that is more than two years ago. I am very sure it is thousands of American legs, arms and lives ago.

When the self-interest of a few media executives overrode the public’s right to know the truth, the media followed further south that very same day by failing to point out that we Americans were they who made such attacks on independent non-threats war crimes.

Mr. Rich, you owe it to your public to get into the fray and tell the truth. This administration is extraordinarily competent at advancing its illegal, immoral and deadly agenda. Until New Orleans votes republican….

The immorality and illegality began in Florida in 2000. It grew as the executives waited for Enron, WTC 1, WTC 2 and WTC 7 to implode. Do you think that Muslims would attack their enemies on a day that means “emergency call” only to Americans? If it weren’t for the three thousand needless deaths that day and the thousands of arms, legs and lives since then, it would be funny.

Risk your job. Call a spade a spade. Ask why the secret service didn’t protect the president and the innocent bystanders at Booker on the morning of September 11, 2001. Or were they “just incompetent” like Brownie. Demand the pentagon tapes.

BTW, the other half believes that the hi-jackers were muslim suicide fanatics. As long as one argues either case, the real criminals of 911 will continue to be rich and free.

August 27, 2006 @ 7:42 am | Comment

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.