Nicholas Kristof: Don’t turn us into poodles

Kristof is actually okay today, if still his usual wishy-washy self. I love his points about Fox news and the WSJ’s editorial writers misrepresenting what was going on in Iraq.

Don’t Turn Us Into Poodles
Published: July 4, 2006

With President Bush leading a charge against this “disgraceful” newspaper, and a conservative talk show host, Melanie Morgan, suggesting that maybe The Times’s executive editor should be executed for treason, we face a fundamental dispute about the role of the news media in America.

At stake is the administration’s campaign to recast the relationship between government and press.

One mechanism is the threat to prosecute editors or reporters, for the first time, under the 1917 Espionage Act. Perhaps more likely may be an effort to subpoena James Risen and Eric Lichtblau, two reporters for this newspaper, to compel them to disclose confidential sources — and then to imprison them when they refuse. Granted, many Americans, believing that the press is arrogant and out of control, wouldn’t be bothered by that.

Two disclosures by this newspaper have sparked particular outrage: a report about National Security Agency wiretapping without warrants and one about a program to track terror financing by examining bank transfers.

The first scoop strikes me as the best of journalism, for it revealed possibly illegal behavior without any apparent risk to national security. The wiretapping was already well known, and the only new information was that it was conducted without warrants. That’s useful information to citizens, but not to terrorists.

The more recent disclosure about bank transfers seems to me a harder call. The program seems both legal and sensible, and it would be a setback in the unlikely event that bankers backed off in the glare of publicity.

So, I might have made that decision differently. But so far there is no evidence that the banking story harmed national security, and I’m sure that editors of this newspaper, The Los Angeles Times and The Wall Street Journal weighed their responsibilities seriously, for they have repeatedly held back information when necessary. In contrast, the press-bashers have much less credibility.

Take Pat Roberts, the Kansas Republican who is head of the Senate Intelligence Committee. Senator Roberts has criticized The Times, but he himself is responsible for an egregious disclosure of classified intelligence. As National Journal reported in April, it was Senator Roberts who stated as the Iraq war began that the U.S. had “human intelligence that indicated the location of Saddam Hussein.”

That statement horrified some in our intelligence community by revealing that we had an agent close to Saddam.

No responsible newspaper would risk an agent’s life so blithely. And The Times would never have been as cavalier about Valerie Plame Wilson’s identity as the White House was. The fact is, journalists regularly hold back information for national security reasons; I recently withheld information at the request of the intelligence community about secret terrorist communications.

More broadly, the one thing worse than a press that is “out of control” is one that is under control. Anybody who has lived in a Communist country knows that. Just consider what would happen if the news media as a whole were as docile to the administration as Fox News or The Wall Street Journal editorial page.

When I was covering the war in Iraq, we reporters would sometimes tune to Fox News and watch, mystified, as it purported to describe how Iraqis loved Americans. Such coverage (backed by delusional Journal editorials baffling to anyone who was actually in Iraq) misled conservatives about Iraq from the beginning. In retrospect, the real victims of Fox News weren’t the liberals it attacked but the conservatives who believed it.

Historically, we in the press have done more damage to our nation by withholding secret information than by publishing it. One example was this newspaper’s withholding details of the plans for the Bay of Pigs invasion. President Kennedy himself suggested that the U.S. would have been better served if The Times had published the full story and derailed the invasion.

Then there were the C.I.A. abuses that journalists kept mum about until they spilled over and prompted the Church Committee investigation in the 1970’s. And there are secrets we should have found, but didn’t: in the run-up to the Iraq war, the press — particularly this newspaper — was too credulous about claims that Iraq possessed large amounts of W.M.D.

In each of these cases, we were too compliant. We failed in our watchdog role, and we failed our country.

So be very wary of Mr. Bush’s effort to tame the press. Watchdogs can be mean, dumb and obnoxious, but it would be even more dangerous to trade them in for lap dogs.

The Discussion: 10 Comments

Not a big fan of Kristof, but liked this:

“(T)he one thing worse than a press that is “out of control” is one that is under control.

July 4, 2006 @ 7:05 am | Comment

Hey Richard, since I’m not willing to subscribe to TimesSelect, I was wondering if you could tell me what the “Kicking and Screaming” blog at is all about.

July 5, 2006 @ 5:02 am | Comment

Dave, I’ve never seen it – send me a link (even if you can’t get access the page) and I’ll see what I can do.

July 5, 2006 @ 7:14 am | Comment

Richard, it was up this afternoon but now I’m having trouble finding it. Here’s the subscription redirect link from my browser history:

Otherwise, all I know is there’s a blog named Kicking and Screaming on TimesSelect and it had a post named “The Road to Nowhere in Latin America”, or some variation on that title.

July 5, 2006 @ 1:36 pm | Comment

It’s all about soccer – thus the name “kicking and screaming.” It basically a blog about the World Cup.

July 5, 2006 @ 5:55 pm | Comment

ah, my curiosity is sated. Cheers.

By the way, I’ve only just gotten back into the web, but I thought my add I live in Quanzhou, between Xiamen and Fuzhou. I’m now official a Denizen of the Strait.

P.S. Does anybody know anything about banana trees? The one I got is dying on me quick.

July 6, 2006 @ 2:51 am | Comment

Hey, Dave, you know Richard and I just visited Xiamen and liked it a lot. What are your new digs like?

July 6, 2006 @ 12:33 pm | Comment

Really? I haven’t gone out to Xiamen yet, but Quanzhou has traditional culture coming out of its pores. I’ve got a nice big place on a promenade street with a big gate at the front. I’m surrounded by calligraphers and tea shops. So far most of my furniture purchases have been in bamboo (its cheaper). Quanzhou (district) supposedly is the ancestral home of half of Taiwan. I’ve already spent evenings hearing minnanhua and classical jingju performances outside my window (given free by visiting troupes from Xiamen). After Xinjiang, this place is uber-Chinese, in that good cultural preservation way (that and its rich, which I guess is why). I was originally going to land in Beijing, but through a personal twist of fate I ended up here and it’s a much better place to be (blue skies, anyone?) I still have to make Hong Kong visa runs (business visa), so if anyone wants to meet for a meal, drop me a line. Maybe I’ll get a seat on one of those direct link flights, I figure I oughta see Taiwan being this close.

July 6, 2006 @ 2:53 pm | Comment

Xiamen is beautiful. You can also take the ferry boat from there straight to Kinmen island in Taiwan (or so I hear) and then plane or train it to Taipei – faster than going through HK.

July 6, 2006 @ 8:23 pm | Comment

Well, Dave, I am so in love with Xiamen, and now I’m pretty sure I have to go check out Quanzhou. I have to say, Fujian is just gorgeous, overall. And I was surprised by the amount of standard Mandarin spoken – I wasn’t expecting that.

So are you free to discuss what you’re doing there? I’m still trying to figure out what I want to do when I grow up…or when my film industry bureaucrat job either ends or my head explodes from reading too many effin’ awful stupid scripts.

July 7, 2006 @ 12:03 am | Comment

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.