Maureen Dowd: Cheney “the heart of darkness”

He really is a bad guy. Evil? I can’t say that for sure, but definitely megalomaniacal and ruthless in a very nasty way. Maybe “his intentions were good” – liberty and all that (I’m sure oil never entered his mind) but so were Mao’s when he launched the Great Leap Backward. Most of us have no idea just how serious this is: Cheney was effectively running a shadow government, and Shrub’s antic were just window dressing for something far more insidious.

Dick at the Heart of Darkness
By Maureen Dowd
The New York Times

Wednesday 26 October 2005

After W. was elected, he sometimes gave visitors a tour of the love alcove off the Oval Office where Bill trysted with Monica – the notorious spot where his predecessor had dishonored the White House.

At least it was only a little pantry – and a little panting.

If W. wants to show people now where the White House has been dishonored in far more astounding and deadly ways, he’ll have to haul them around every nook and cranny of his vice president’s office, then go across the river for a walk of shame through the Rummy empire


at the Pentagon.

The shocking thing about the trellis of revelations showing Dick Cheney, the self-styled Mr. Strong America, as the central figure in dark conspiracies to juice up a case for war and demonize those who tried to tell the public the truth is how un-shocking it all is.

It’s exactly what we thought was going on, but we never thought we’d actually hear the lurid details: Cheney and Rummy, the two old compadres from the Nixon and Ford days, in a cabal running the country and the world into the ground, driven by their poisonous obsession with Iraq, while Junior is out of the loop, playing in the gym or on his mountain bike.

Mr. Cheney has been so well protected by his Praetorian guard all these years that it’s been hard for the public to see his dastardly deeds and petty schemes. But now, because of Patrick Fitzgerald’s investigation and candid talk from Brent Scowcroft and Lawrence Wilkerson, he’s been flushed out as the heart of darkness: all sulfurous strands lead back to the man W. aptly nicknamed Vice.

According to a Times story yesterday, Scooter Libby first learned about Joseph Wilson’s C.I.A. wife from his boss, Mr. Cheney, not from reporters, as he’d originally suggested. And Mr. Cheney learned it from George Tenet, according to Mr. Libby’s notes.

The Bush hawks presented themselves as protectors and exporters of American values. But they were so feverish about projecting the alternate reality they had constructed to link Saddam and Al Qaeda – and fulfilling their idée fixe about invading Iraq – they perverted American values.

Whether or not it turns out to be illegal, outing a C.I.A. agent – undercover or not – simply to undermine her husband’s story is Rove-ishly sleazy. This no-leak administration was perfectly willing to leak to hurt anyone who got in its way.

Vice also pressed for a loophole so the C.I.A. could do torture-light on prisoners in U.S. custody, but John McCain rebuffed His Tortureness. Senator McCain has sponsored a measure to bar the cruel treatment of prisoners because he knows that this is not who we are. (Remember the days when the only torture was listening to politicians reciting their best TV lines at dinner parties?)

Colonel Wilkerson, the former chief of staff for Colin Powell, broke the code and denounced Vice’s vortex, calling his own involvement in Mr. Powell’s U.N. speech, infected with bogus Cheney and Scooter malarkey, “the lowest point” in his life.

He followed that with a blast of blunt talk in a speech and an op-ed piece in The Los Angeles Times, saying that foreign policy had been hijacked by “a secretive, little-known cabal” that hated dissent. He said the cabal was headed by Mr. Cheney, “a vice president who speaks only to Rush Limbaugh and assembled military forces,” and Donald Rumsfeld, “a secretary of defense presiding over the death by a thousand cuts of our overstretched armed forces.”

“I believe that the decisions of this cabal were sometimes made with the full and witting support of the president and sometimes with something less,” Colonel Wilkerson wrote. “More often than not, then-national security adviser Condoleezza Rice was simply steamrolled by this cabal.”

Brent Scowcroft, Bush Senior’s close friend, let out a shriek this week to Jeffrey Goldberg in The New Yorker, revealing his estrangement from W. and his old protégé Condi. He disdained Paul Wolfowitz as a naïve utopian and said he didn’t “know” his old friend Dick Cheney anymore. Vice’s alliance with the neocons, who were determined to finish in Iraq what Mr. Scowcroft and Poppy had declared finished, led him to lead the nation into a morass. Troop deaths are now around 2,000, a gruesome milestone.

“The reason I part with the neocons is that I don’t think in any reasonable time frame the objective of democratizing the Middle East can be successful,” Mr. Scowcroft said. “If you can do it, fine, but I don’t think you can, and in the process of trying to do it you can make the Middle East a lot worse.”

W. should take the Medal of Freedom away from Mr. Tenet and give medals to Colonel Wilkerson and Mr. Scowcroft.

The Discussion: 7 Comments

Again Richard, many thanks for providing this for us. Do you actually subscribe to NYTimes select that you have access to it?
My problem with this select business is simply this:
I KNOW what Dowd is going to write. She’s not telling me anything that surprises me; it’s just that the anger she uses is like a morning cup of coffee. But I don’t need to pay to find out any revelations as she won’t give me any. All of these articles are op-eds written by people I’m so familiar with that if I do pay, it’s because I know who they are.
Point: Only people who agree with the Friedmans and Diowd’s will pay to read them for the most part, so any message they provide is diluted to those already converted to the cause.

October 26, 2005 @ 6:41 pm | Comment

I get them emailed to me, but they are also available on many, many blogs and other free sites.

Dowd can be a nastr witch at times and she can drive me crazy. But she is one of the best connected wreporters in Washington and when she’s on-target no one’s better or more sardonic. She knows Cheney and Rummy better than anyone. Lately, I’ve been loving her columns and consider them required reading. If I post a NYT column here, it’s because I think everyone should read it.

October 26, 2005 @ 6:47 pm | Comment

Oh yes, Richard.

Didn’t you know that Cheney was the Anti-Christ?

….he is just evil… hahaha

October 26, 2005 @ 11:10 pm | Comment

I haven’t seen any documented evidence that Cheney is the anti-Christ, but I’m not ruling out the possibility entirely. i do think he is the source of many of this administrations worst aspects: obsessive secrecy, insanely misleading spin (Saddam being connected to 911, remember?), cronyism, war profiteering, scorn for the environment, favors for oil companies…. Wouldn’t you agree?

October 27, 2005 @ 12:00 am | Comment

Cheney = Mao.
Of course. How didn’t I realize it? Another milestone in Richard’s collection.

October 27, 2005 @ 8:33 am | Comment

Cheney – Mao?? Don’t be ridiculous – Mao had more hair.

October 27, 2005 @ 6:23 pm | Comment

And that cute little mole on his chin.

October 27, 2005 @ 7:58 pm | Comment

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.